Macedonia - Professor Μillers Letter to "Archaeology" Magazine

January 22, 2009

Editor, Archaeology Magazine

36-36 33 rd Street

Long Island City, NY 11106

U.S.A.

Dear Sir,

I opened the January/February issue of Archaeology today and eagerly turned to

“A Letter from Macedonia” only to discover that it was actually a letter from ancient

Paionia – the land north of Mt. Barmous and Mt. Orbelos. Livy’s account of the

creation of the Roman province of Macedonia (45.29.7 and 12) makes clear that the

Paionians lived north of those mountains (which form today the geographically natural

northern limits of Greece) and south of the Dardanians who were in today’s Kosovo.

Strabo (7. frag 4) is even more succinct in saying that Paionia was north of Macedonia

and the only connection from one to the other was (and is today) through the narrow

gorge of the Axios (or Vardar) River. In other words, the land which is described by

Matthew Brunwasser in his “Owning Alexander” was Paionia in antiquity.

While it is true that those people were subdued by Philip II, father of Alexander, in 359

B.C. (Diodorus Siculus 16.4.2), they were never Macedonians and never lived in

Macedonia. Indeed, Demosthenes (Olynthian 1.23) tells us that they were “enslaved”

by the Macedonian Philip and clearly, therefore, not Macedonians. Isokrates (5.23)

makes the same point. Likewise, for example, the Egyptians who were subdued by

Alexander may have been ruled by Macedonians, including the famous Cleopatra, but

they were never Macedonians themselves, and Egypt was never called Macedonia (and

so far as I can tell does not seek that name today).

Certainly, as Thucydides (2.99) tells us, the Macedonians had taken over “a

narrow strip of Paionia extending along the Axios river from the interior to Pella and

the sea”. One might therefore understand if the people in the modern republic

centered at Skopje called themselves Paionians and claimed as theirs the land

described by Thucydides. But why, instead, would the modern people of ancient Paionia 

try to call themselves Macedonians and their land Macedonia? M

r. Brunwasser (p. 55) touches on the Greek claims “that it implies ambitions over G

reek territory” and he notes that “the northern province of Greece is also called Mac

edonia.” Leaving aside the fact that the area of that northern province of modern Greecehas 

been called Macedonia for more than 2,500 years (see, inter alios, Herodotus 5.17; 7.128, et alibi),
more recent history shows that the Greek concerns are legitimate. For example, a map produced in

Skopje in 1992 shows clearly the claim that Macedonia extends from there to Mt.

Olympus in the south; that is, combining the ancient regions of Paionia and

Macedonia into a single entity. (Figure1)

Figure 1

The same claim is explicit on a pseudo-bank note of

the “Republic of Macedonia” which shows, as one of its monuments, the White Tow

er of Thessalonike, in Greece.(Figure 2)

There are many more examples of calendars, Christmas cards, bumper-stickers, etc.,

that all make the same claim.

Figure 2

Further, Mr. Brunwasser has reported with approval (International Herald

Tribune 10/1/08) the work of the “Macedonian Institute for Strategic Research 16:9”, the name of which refers “to Acts 16:9, a verse in the New Testament in which a

Macedonian man appears to the Apostle Paul begging him: ‘Come over into

Macedonia, and help us.’" But where did Paul go in Macedonia? Neapolis (Kavala),

Philippi, Amphipolis, Apollonia, Thessaloniki, and Veroia (Acts 16:11-17:10) all of

which are in the historic Macedonia, none in Paionia. What claim is being made by an

Institute based in Skopje that names itself for a trip through what was Macedonia in

antiquity and what is the northern province of Greece today?

I wonder what we would conclude if a certain large

island off the southeast coastof the United States started to call itself Florida, and emblazoned its currency with images of Disney World and distributed maps showing

the Greater Florida.

Certainly there was no doubt of the underlying point of “Macedonia” in the

mind of U.S. Secretary of State Edward Stettinius on December 26, 1944, when he

wrote:

“The Department [of State] has noted with considera ble apprehension

increasing propaganda rumors and semi-official statements in favor of

an autonomous Macedonia, emanating principally from Bulgaria, but

also from Yugoslav Partisan and other sources, withthe implication that

Greek territory would be included in the projected state. Thisgovernment considers talk of Macedonian ”nation”, Macedonian “Fatherland”, or Macedonian “national consciousness” to be unjustified demagoguery representing no ethnic nor political re

ality, and sees in its present revival a possible cloak for aggressive intentions against

Greece.”

[Source: U.S. State Department, Foreign Relations

vol viii,

Washington, D.C., Circular Airgram (868.014/26Dec1

944)]

Mr. Brunwasser (a resident of Bulgaria), however,

goes on to state, with apparent distain, that Greece claims “Alexander III of Maced

on (Alexander the Great) . . . as Greek.”

This attitude mystifies me. What is there to “claim”? Alexander’s great-great-great grandfather, Alexander I, was certified as Greek at Olympia and, in the words of

the father of history “I happen to know that [the forefathers of Alexander] are Greek”

(Herodotus 5.22). Alexander’s father, Philip, won several equestrian victories at

Olympia and Delphi (Plutarch, Alexander 4.9; Moralia 105A), the two most Hellenic of all the sanctuaries in ancient Greece where non-Greeks were not allowed to compete.

If Philip was Greek, wasn’t his son also Greek? When Euripides – who died and was buried in Macedonia (Thucydides apud Pal. Anth. 7.45; Pausanias 1.2.2; Diodorus Siculus 13.103) – wrote his play Archelaos in honor of the great-uncle of Alexander, did he write it in Slavic? When he wrote the Bacchai while at the court of Archelaos did he not write it in Greek even as it has survived to us? Or should we imagine that Euripides was a “Macedonian” who wrote in Slavic (at a date when that language is not atte sted) which was translated into Greek?

What was the language of instruction when Aristotl

e taught Alexander? What language was carried by Alexander with him on his expedition to the East? Why do we have ancient inscriptions in Greek in settlements e

stablished by Alexander as far away as Afghanistan, and none in Slavic? Why did Greek become the lingua franca inAlexander’s empire if he was actually a “Macedonian”? Why was the New Testament

written in Greek rather than Slavic? On page 57 of the so-called “Letter from Macedonia” there is a photograph of the author standing “before a bronze statue of Alexander the Great in the city of Prilep.”

The statue is patently modern, but the question is whether the real historic Alexander

could have read the Slavic inscription beneath his feet. Given the known historic

posterity of Slavic to Greek, the answer is obvious.

While Mr. Brunwasser’s reporting of the archaeological work in Paionia is

welcome, his adoption and promotion of the modern political stance of its people about

the use of the name Macedonia is not only unwelcome, it is a disservice to the readers of Archaeology who are, I imagine, interested in historic fact. But then, the decision to propagate this historical nonsense by Archaeology –a publication of the

Archaeological Institute of America - is a disservice to its own reputation.

Let it be said once more: the region of ancient P

aionia was a part of the Macedonian empire. So were Ephesos and Tyre and Pa

lestine and Memphis and Babylon and Taxila and dozens more. They may thus

have become “Macedonian” temporarily, but none was ever “Macedonia”.

Allow me to end this exegesis by making a suggestion to resolve the question of

the modern use of the name “Macedonia.” Greece should annex Paionia – that is what

Philip II did in 359 B.C. And that would appear to

be acceptable to the modern residents of that area since they claim to be Greek

by appropriating the name Macedonia and its most famous man. Then the modern

people of this new Greek province could work on learning to speak and read a

nd write Greek, hopefully even as well as Alexander did.

Sincerely,

Stephen G. Miller

Professor Emeritus,

University of California, Berkeley

PS: For a more complete examination of the ancientevidence regarding Paionia, see I. L.

Merker, “The Ancient Kingdom of Paionia,” Balkan Studies 6 (1965) 35-54

cc: C. Brian Rose, President, Archaeological Institute of America

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State of

the United States of America

Dora Bakoyiannis, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Greece

Antonis Samaras, Minister of Culture of Greece

Olli Rehn, European Commissioner for Enlargement

Erik Meijer, Member, European Parliament